On April 13, 1993, I flew to Virginia to attend the 250th Anniversary of the Birth of Thomas Jefferson at the University of Virginia (UVa), the school he founded. One of the most fascinating things about the celebration was that both the conservative columnist George Will and the former head of the U.S.S.R., Mikhail Gorbachev, were keynote speakers praising Jefferson. If I needed any evidence that TJ appeals to a broad range of political viewpoints, that was it. It was at this event that I heard about The Jefferson Symposium to be held that June, and I returned to UVa by car for my first Symposium. I have attended most of them since that time, and have become one of a group of "regulars" from around the country and across the political spectrum.
So here I am at the 19th Symposium. All the ones I've attended have been organized and led by Peter Onuf, the Thomas Jefferson Foundation Professor of History at UVa, and another distinguished professor, usually a friend of Peter's. I believe Peter is the leading active Jefferson scholar in the world, and besides being an esteemed scholar and outstanding lecturer he is friendly, funny, and challenging. Peter invites an interesting group of scholars who may not be 'Jefferson scholars', but have expertise regarding the annual topic. The Symposium draws a diverse group of Jefferson admirers and others who just want to learn more about him. Often the merely curious are teachers. This year the topic is "In Jefferson's Voice: A Vision for America", from Sunday afternoon, July 29, to Thursday morning, August 2, and the intent is "to explore Thomas Jefferson's writings and the influence they have exerted to this day." When we arrived we received a packet of TJ's writings and each session was to be organized around selected texts. Much of the fun of the sessions and the social gatherings outside the classrooms is the lively discussion/debates that take place between and among the faculty and participants. I often find that my understanding of TJ differs from that of the faculty and the participants. Again that is the case, but this year feels like my views are getting more respect.
Although most newcomers and faculty assume the faculty knows more about TJ than us students, that's not always the case. Myself, some regulars, and even some first-timers, may have studied TJ more diligently than the faculty members whose areas of interest only touch on TJ, and then only from an academic perspective. Our interest tends to be more personal and practical: we care about TJ and what he stand for. Once again that seems to a distinction regarding one or two of the faculty.
Recent Comments